|
Post by highlander74 on Feb 3, 2016 10:59:07 GMT -5
Hi comrades,
this is the question: Basilisk or Medusa Siege Gun? In my list I run till now a battery of two Basilisks and a couple of Medusa with or without breaching shell (it depends on situations), Now I'm wondering if it will not be better to run a couple of battery of two Basilisks and no Medusa at all, or a large battery of 3 Basilisks and a single Medusa in dedicated AT role... What's your ideas about?
|
|
|
Post by fullmetaljacket on Feb 11, 2016 20:13:30 GMT -5
SO fluff answer: if they have broken through your lines and reached your basalisk your fighting a battle your already losing... the basalisk is a gun that is kept in the rear while the medusa is brought up to the front lines using that short more power full range to do the most damage. Game answer: i believe this will depend on the rest of your army, is the rest of your army dedicated more towards anti horde/ infantry or is it geared towards taking out armour. use your artillery to complete your army / support your army not be your army if that makes sense
FMJ
|
|
|
Post by that1guy on Mar 22, 2016 18:58:55 GMT -5
I think you should run the Medusa because I think it would be cooler, although for what reason I cannot say. Hey, you didn't ask for a GREAT reason. You just asked what I thought. No mention of screening those thoughts for enlightening, wisdom filled replies. Yeah.
So in short, I think the Medusa looks cooler.
|
|