|
Post by Melissia on Jan 12, 2010 16:34:17 GMT -5
The latest scuttlebutt in the Bell of Lost Souls and other places is that the Grey Knights (not Daemonhunters or Inquisition) are getting a codex as the last codex of this year, or the first of next year. Sources are various people on BoLS, and here: www.brueckenkopf-online.com/?p=11088#comments
|
|
|
Post by Ymmot (M.I.A) on Jan 12, 2010 17:29:07 GMT -5
Hmm...
looks interesting... (I was guessing Dark Angels before Black Templars...and Grey Knights kinda came out of nowhere!)
|
|
|
Post by Makarova (M.I.A) on Jan 12, 2010 17:34:17 GMT -5
Every other release a Marine codex, heh. Well it does look alright, I would've preferred the Sisters of Battle but Grey Knights should be rather interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Spinning Head Guy on Jan 12, 2010 17:40:17 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm no fan, but it's an "odd" choice and I love when it's something more intresting than another marine.
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jan 13, 2010 14:54:45 GMT -5
Grey Knights are marines. It's taking me ages to finish the Grey Knights Omnibus. There was a piece of GK art on BoLS ages ago, and rumours saying it might be the new codex cover.
|
|
|
Post by nicholasakira on Jan 13, 2010 15:04:10 GMT -5
(reads schedule) I am a very sad laptop.
Then again, this is just internet prattle. I'll have to wait a bit and see how this turns out.
|
|
|
Post by seed on Jan 13, 2010 17:53:06 GMT -5
Not a hint of anything interesting for me. The beast men might have some fun kits for converting. Wonder how a full army list of just grey knights will work.
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jan 14, 2010 6:42:25 GMT -5
Somehow just writing the words 'Grey Knight (not Inquisition)', managed to spark a massive BoLS argument about whether the branches should have separate codexes, or all squeezed into one. I think if they stated GK, then they will be separate. So expect a Sister codex out after that, but no separate Inquisitors? Hopefully they'll address that with Special Characters.
e.g. Inquisitor Eisenhorn could be the new way to take a daemonhost, or Radical Inquisition.
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Jan 14, 2010 7:19:59 GMT -5
Somehow just writing the words 'Grey Knight (not Inquisition)', managed to spark a massive BoLS argument about whether the branches should have separate codexes, or all squeezed into one. I think if they stated GK, then they will be separate. So expect a Sister codex out after that, but no separate Inquisitors? Hopefully they'll address that with Special Characters. e.g. Inquisitor Eisenhorn could be the new way to take a daemonhost, or Radical Inquisition. That would make me cry. Eisenhorn was a guns-for-leather puritan for most of his career, and hardly the only Inquisitor who turns up with a Daemonhost in the Eisenhorn books.
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jan 15, 2010 12:32:27 GMT -5
Nobody in the Inquisition cares about what he used to be. As soon as he pressed that button he became a Radical. Anyway as far as GW cares you can say : "My Eisenhorn is really Quixos, or whoever."
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jan 15, 2010 20:13:04 GMT -5
The whole point of the books was to watch his former convictions slowly eroded, and be became something he would have hated earlier in his career.
|
|
|
Post by seed on Jan 16, 2010 1:40:13 GMT -5
The whole point of the books was to watch his former convictions slowly eroded, and be became something he would have hated earlier in his career. Just like growing up
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jan 19, 2010 17:08:49 GMT -5
If you just stand back for a second and look at what he did to that former friend of his, you really see how far he went..
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Mar 17, 2010 14:03:35 GMT -5
So far this schedule has proven true.
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Mar 19, 2010 6:42:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Mar 19, 2010 9:44:47 GMT -5
which really is just like I said
|
|
|
Post by ranwulf on Mar 19, 2010 15:16:19 GMT -5
Ahhh...the Paladins of Warhammer 40000, I love them, if they weren't so expensive, I would play with them! But, cool things launching these year!
|
|
|
Post by Adam Selene on Mar 21, 2010 20:03:05 GMT -5
Khemri then Necrons, thats funny, will their kits be swapable?
Will probable hold out until proper inquisition comes along, thus i will be able to make hardline/antipysker backed up by new plastic stormtroopers (i hope they come out with inquisition)
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Mar 21, 2010 20:09:00 GMT -5
Inquisition will probably not be released this edition . Instead we will get Grey Knights and Sisters of Battle.
For which we can be thankful, as a combined inquisition codex would suck anal fudge.
|
|
|
Post by John_Galt (M.I.A) on Mar 22, 2010 23:26:03 GMT -5
I still have an un-opened box of GK termies
|
|
deton8r
Guardsman
Bending rules and asking dumb questions
Posts: 72
|
Post by deton8r on Mar 25, 2010 9:38:26 GMT -5
Word that i got was that roughly october was going to be the gk release and its not going to include SoB, aparently the gk termies are almost there and look awesome.
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Mar 25, 2010 15:28:27 GMT -5
The Radical Inquisition need their own codex if they're getting left out.
|
|
|
Post by seed on Mar 25, 2010 23:20:58 GMT -5
The Radical Inquisition need their own codex if they're getting left out. What about the poor lost and the dammed.
|
|
|
Post by Gabriel Lupus on Mar 31, 2010 10:47:05 GMT -5
er... if it's going to be a "Grey Knights" Codex (and eventually SoB codex and maybe even Deathwatch codex), I'd still use my Witch/Daemon Hunters codexes - different codexes to the new ones you see...
I can back this (rather odd) claim up with a viable argument if need be...
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Mar 31, 2010 18:30:18 GMT -5
I don't really care, I'd be glad to get the Inquisition out of my Sisters of Battle codex.
|
|