|
|
Post by sammy1979 on Apr 12, 2007 11:38:29 GMT -5
just took a little nosy at the forge world site how awsome does the macharius tank look its wicked i think i'd rather have one of them then a baneblade its reeel pretty
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2007 23:53:25 GMT -5
yeh its pretty sweet...smaller than a baneblade but just as deadly
|
|
|
|
Post by Commissar on Apr 14, 2007 2:15:07 GMT -5
Ooooo!
It looks great!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2007 3:25:35 GMT -5
I've always liked the heavy tank idea. I think forge world might have been inspired by the Soviet Heavy Tank from the old school red alert game on this one, with the dual battle cannons and such. From what I hear there's another one coming out soon with like a hull demolisher cannon and about a gazillion heavy bolters. Looks kind of like a WWI tank.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2007 5:08:17 GMT -5
It looks very really good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warmaster Stabwhiskers on Apr 14, 2007 21:59:39 GMT -5
Red Alert Aftermath = Macharius Tank Inspiration
|
|
|
|
Post by skizoman333 on Apr 20, 2007 12:24:01 GMT -5
is it me or do the forge world have a sorta fetish with heavy stubbers. Dont get me wrong, i like em just as much as the next guy, but they put them on everything
|
|
|
|
Post by thefishki345 on Apr 20, 2007 22:01:48 GMT -5
lol
i love the chaos dreadnoughts they look cool aswell check them out
|
|
|
|
Post by sammy1979 on Apr 21, 2007 12:56:06 GMT -5
god damn it stop polluting our air with your choas nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefishki345 on Apr 21, 2007 21:21:21 GMT -5
lol haha
dont worry soon i will get bored... sadly
|
|
|
|
Post by Commissar on Apr 22, 2007 1:24:34 GMT -5
LoL, ah well stubbers are awesome sauce!
|
|
|
|
Post by thefishki345 on Apr 22, 2007 5:55:16 GMT -5
yep i agree
|
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Sept 24, 2007 4:50:28 GMT -5
If you fire enough heavy stubbers at something, eventually it will die. Even Wraithlords.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2007 8:43:23 GMT -5
I dont have my book right in front of me but arent stubbers strengh 4? so that would mean they cant hurt a wraithlord at T8 then right?
|
|
|
|
Post by sammy1979 on Sept 24, 2007 9:40:13 GMT -5
i think there s 6 ap 4 and storm bolters are s4 ap 6 or something probably wrong
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2007 19:57:28 GMT -5
A stubber is what you thought the bolter was, 4/6 and the bolter is infact the same strength but ap 5. I'm fairly sure of it. The difference comes mostly in the number of shots and range if memory serves well.
The stubber is better for a tank in my opinion since most will have weapons like the heavy bolter and that is the same range and use as a stubber and the stubber fires as much as heavy bolters can. So for a small price more anti infantry shots that are quite capable of tipping the balance your way and making the enemy flee from casualties
p.s not sure if I'm meant to say too much about stats so delete this at your discretion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Commissar on Sept 25, 2007 18:43:33 GMT -5
Stubbers are necessary for tanks, especially when infantry support gets diverted and the approaching enemy infantry are still comin at you even after a few battle cannon blasts, just to finally wipe em out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 16:43:10 GMT -5
meh.
|
|
