|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 24, 2010 7:53:15 GMT -5
Technically, you're right. It's not. But the uhive doesn't count, and there are deleted posts in that total as well.
Ah... the lost Allies section. Well, the new one's more fun.
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Jun 24, 2010 12:49:08 GMT -5
From DAkka Dakka on the subject of the new pdfs:
|
|
|
Post by Ymmot (M.I.A) on Jun 24, 2010 12:54:55 GMT -5
I've only had a look at the Witch Hunter one, but it is indeed missing the section about taking WH as allies and the part about adversaries is also missing.
However, the part about adding inducted space marines or imperial guard to a Witch Hunters army is still included.
|
|
|
Post by RedsandRoyals on Jun 24, 2010 12:56:14 GMT -5
Ah, so the Allies were left out due to general incompetence, as opposed to intentional idiocy on GW's part.
Reds
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Jun 24, 2010 13:01:34 GMT -5
Right. Incompetence indeed.
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 24, 2010 13:04:46 GMT -5
GW. Do you need to ask? I told you not to get upset, and ignore it.
|
|
igdude
Lieutenant
I'm right behind you!
Posts: 116
|
Post by igdude on Jun 24, 2010 16:50:09 GMT -5
Ah, so the Allies were left out due to general incompetence, as opposed to intentional idiocy on GW's part. Reds Is there any difference when it comes to GW? Also, I'm mad that they also removed the mini army lists at the end, I though they were a nice touch.
|
|
|
Post by Gabriel Lupus on Jun 25, 2010 16:32:07 GMT -5
I think it would have been an ample opportunity to give the stormtroopers hellguns AP3... but what do I know...
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Jun 26, 2010 7:58:54 GMT -5
It would have been an opportunity to do a lot of things, but GW doesn't do things unless it's practically forced to (like with a new codex).
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Jun 26, 2010 9:24:59 GMT -5
It would have been an opportunity to do a lot of things, but GW doesn't do things unless it's going to squeeze you for the maximum possible profit. Fixed.
|
|
|
Post by Gabriel Lupus on Jun 27, 2010 16:00:14 GMT -5
Both versions are probably valid Thinking about it though, would you allow your opponent (or request permission from your opponent) to use the Guard hellgun stats for Inquisitorial stormies?
|
|
|
Post by Ymmot (M.I.A) on Jun 27, 2010 16:06:00 GMT -5
Perhaps if they paid the points for them.
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 27, 2010 16:11:11 GMT -5
I'd be more inclined to let them upgrade it to S4 AP- with a re-roll to wound.
|
|
|
Post by privateflippy on Jun 27, 2010 18:53:51 GMT -5
I agree with Manicorn Lover; S4 AP - with re rolls would dish out more potential penetrating shots
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 27, 2010 19:36:50 GMT -5
Reds, you had better put my title back really soon...
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Jun 27, 2010 20:14:37 GMT -5
Quite wrong, as usual-- GW has done plenty of unprofitable things.
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 27, 2010 20:27:14 GMT -5
I say you're both only half right.
Mel, you should have been more specific, and said, "GW doesn't do things it doesn't want to do..."
RT, you should have just said "money," not "profit."
|
|
|
Post by RedsandRoyals on Jun 27, 2010 21:37:24 GMT -5
I agree with Manicorn Lover; S4 AP - with re rolls would dish out more potential penetrating shots This made my night. Reds
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 27, 2010 22:02:04 GMT -5
It's all fun and games, until you fool someone with a slanderous title.
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Jun 28, 2010 4:57:24 GMT -5
I say you're both only half right. Mel, you should have been more specific, and said, "GW doesn't do things it doesn't want to do..." RT, you should have just said "money," not "profit." Indeed. Must update post....crap. No, it's not even revenue. They just try to screw you.... Quite wrong, as usual-- GW has done plenty of unprofitable things. Whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Gabriel Lupus on Jun 28, 2010 12:26:45 GMT -5
GW has done plenty of unprofitable things. Intentionally?
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jun 28, 2010 15:00:24 GMT -5
LoTR must have been unprofitable.
|
|
|
Post by The Envoy (AWOL) on Jun 28, 2010 15:05:07 GMT -5
LoTR was probably a huge mistake that kept growing and growing and growing...
|
|
|
Post by cheminhaler on Jun 28, 2010 15:41:38 GMT -5
Like gandalf's long, soft, white, hairy beard..
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Jun 28, 2010 16:46:08 GMT -5
And New Line Cinema said, "You shall not profit!"
|
|