|
Post by Melissia on Aug 19, 2010 18:27:31 GMT -5
I think the spear should be plus 1 or 2 initiative much like Imperial guard rough riders. No. They're entirely different weapons with different purposes, used differently.
|
|
|
Post by havoc on Aug 19, 2010 23:40:17 GMT -5
its still better than I10 F.K.M wtf brimstone rain
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 20, 2010 2:07:45 GMT -5
its still better than I10 F.K.M wtf brimstone rain It's a faith power and if you consider the other faith powers i think it could work.
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Aug 20, 2010 10:56:19 GMT -5
its still better than I10 Currently it isn't I10 at the moment. Power Spear: Power Weapon, +1 strength, two-handed, Reactive Strike Reactive Strike: If a unit with power spears is charged, resolve all power spear attacks first regardless of initiative, then resolve attacks in initiative order as usual.
|
|
|
Post by havoc on Aug 20, 2010 11:27:31 GMT -5
ok its now I10 if charged
and about that stone thing no its horrible fanwank how you can make stone fall from SKY by beliving something? faith powers like re-roll to armor save(example) makes some sense but that just breaks it anyway orks already have that
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Aug 20, 2010 11:47:45 GMT -5
Don't ask me, I'm not the one that suggested that.
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 20, 2010 13:00:12 GMT -5
ok its now I10 if charged and about that stone thing no its horrible fanwank how you can make stone fall from SKY by beliving something? faith powers like re-roll to armor save(example) makes some sense but that just breaks it anyway orks already have that I just thought flaming brimstone falling from the sky fit an apocalyptic sisters of battle thing. It just made sense to me. I don't see you coming up with nuts.
|
|
|
Post by Ymmot (M.I.A) on Aug 20, 2010 13:11:02 GMT -5
I donno...sounds like a psychic attack to me... Can't explain fire falling from the sky as a freak act of nature...
That sort of brings it beyond the realm of faith.
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 20, 2010 13:14:56 GMT -5
Well what's your opinion on the rest of the stuff? Besides SoB have still had some faith attacks which turn their ranged attacks at least AP 1 or something like that. It's been a while since i last read the SoB codex.
|
|
|
Post by havoc on Aug 21, 2010 13:52:16 GMT -5
about leman russ why dont just say that they got it after defending forge wold or something like that? you cant really test tank in secret in battlefield F.K.M imho most of them are rubbish
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 21, 2010 14:06:05 GMT -5
about leman russ why dont just say that they got it after defending forge wold or something like that? you cant really test tank in secret in battlefield F.K.M imho most of them are rubbish Oh jeez thanks. I bet you look fugly under that armor too .
|
|
|
Post by havoc on Aug 21, 2010 14:23:36 GMT -5
about leman russ why dont just say that they got it after defending forge wold or something like that? you cant really test tank in secret in battlefield F.K.M imho most of them are rubbish Oh jeez thanks. I bet you look fugly under that armor too . so your protection for your stuff is to comment my avatar right....... most of your stuff is about omgz otherz haz awesum wargeur we must hawe meltagatler omgz lol my brain hurst now
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 21, 2010 15:54:29 GMT -5
Not really i thought some of it was pretty good and i did give the original idea for artificer armor and refractors. 'Divine intervention' is a good name for deepstriking seraphim. I think i came up with a few decent ideas. Besides i was joking with you. The people on this forum are SERIOUS PEOPLES! That's why i wanted you to know i was joking.
|
|
|
Post by havoc on Aug 22, 2010 11:57:56 GMT -5
this is serius businez too bad that divine intervention is taken by GK if rumours are correct
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Aug 22, 2010 17:14:36 GMT -5
I'm not adding that in.
Divine Guidance isn't so much a blatant power as it is the occasional bolter shot getting far luckier than it should and shattering through the weakest point of the enemy's armor.
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 22, 2010 17:42:04 GMT -5
What about the holy sight power i mentioned where you go through cover and shrouded areas?
I'll try to come up with something good but you know easier said than done. Maybe some new vehicles and infantry units would be a good idea. I don't know i'm just trying to think of what you could use.
|
|
|
Post by Hetfiltrator on Aug 24, 2010 11:00:57 GMT -5
I don't know if you'll like it but for power spear's reactive strike provides an additional attack that always hits first regardless of I then they make the rest of their attacks at I value. I think I just confused myself.
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Aug 25, 2010 23:32:06 GMT -5
I don't think I'm adding in any new acts of faith. Actually, I'm considering tossing the acts of faith in the proposed section out, and using just the five in C:WH. They provide a nice balance.
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 26, 2010 0:29:16 GMT -5
Are there any vehicles or infantry that also follow the fluff? I know i've been bitching about it but you should definitely have the refractor fields for faithful units and artificer armor for elite units. Even if celestians are the ones with artificer armor it still reinforces them quite a bit and makes them an alright option. Though personally i've never been a huge fan of multi-meltas wielded by infantry but i'm sure they have other options like heavy flamers or something.
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Aug 26, 2010 0:30:48 GMT -5
I don't think I'm adding in any new acts of faith. Actually, I'm considering tossing the acts of faith in the proposed section out, and using just the five in C:WH. They provide a nice balance. You're still upgrading them so as not to actually encourage letting your forces be killed, right?
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Aug 26, 2010 13:35:17 GMT -5
Yes.
|
|
|
Post by F.K.M on Aug 26, 2010 14:41:54 GMT -5
The sisters will need some new designs and some more ornate armor. I'm figuring that symbol that celestians wear on their heads (on the helmet) could branch out just above the celestian's eyes. It's hard to describe what i mean without drawing it or showing in a picture but unfortunately i suck at drawing.
|
|
|
Post by Hetfiltrator on Aug 31, 2010 21:25:22 GMT -5
The sisters will need some new designs and some more ornate armor. I'm figuring that symbol that celestians wear on their heads (on the helmet) could branch out just above the celestian's eyes. It's hard to describe what i mean without drawing it or showing in a picture but unfortunately i suck at drawing. More ornate? Are you kidding? Sister's armour looks awesome! Its so sleek yet seems to emit power!
|
|
|
Post by ElegaicRequiem on Aug 31, 2010 21:39:23 GMT -5
Let's also remember that the idea here is not to create a new miniatures line, but update the rules for 5th ed, since GW hasn't been bothered to update what is (at least by technicality) the oldest codex they run.
|
|
|
Post by Melissia on Sept 14, 2010 23:34:32 GMT -5
I'm just making the rules. The models are often separate from the rules. I would prefer the chest + abdomen region to be changed to actually looking like they aren't wearing their underwear outside their armor for example (a breastplate based off of gothic platemail would be cool, or perhaps like the breastplate here with a Fleur de Lys in the center where the lines meet). The shoulders, legs, arms, and helmet are great. Even the robes look nice. Regardless, I'm just making rules . Not models.
|
|